Which workflow is currently creating the most drag?
Pick the first product based on the team's most urgent operational bottleneck, not on abstract platform ambition.
Resources
Compare the suite, understand the fit, and evaluate with clearer context.
Compare what each of the five products does, where each one fits operationally, and the questions institutions typically ask as they evaluate the Enrollix suite.
What to use this page for
CP
Compare products
See where each product fits operationally.
FAQ
Review common questions
Understand system fit, governance, and rollout expectations.
DM
Prepare for a demo
Use the comparison to decide what you want to see first.
Product overview and comparison
How the current Enrollix lineup is divided.
| Product | Primary workflow | Main users | What it uses | Where it works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AppAssist | Application review and transcript-centered admissions workflow acceleration | Admissions teams, reviewers, operations staff | Transcripts, SOPs, recommendations, admit rules, application data | Alongside admissions systems and reviewer workflows |
| Campaign Studio | Campaign launch, lead capture, first response, and routing | Enrollment marketing, recruitment operations, continuing education teams | Approved program facts, campaign constraints, forms, pages, workflow rules | Early-funnel campaign and lead workflow layer |
| CampusAssist | Institutional question answering and routine inquiry deflection | Institutional support teams, web teams, staff support channels | Catalog, website, calendar, policy, and other approved institutional content | Public-facing or staff-support institutional information surfaces |
| CourseAssist | Course-scoped support inside the LMS | Students, faculty, teaching and learning teams | Approved course materials, syllabus rules, assignments, course context | Canvas, D2L, Blackboard, and other LMSs |
| AI Gateway | Governed institutional access to 1,000+ AI models | CIO and IT teams, AI governance leaders, faculty, staff, and campus users | Institution policy settings, permissions, branded front-end configuration, managed provider access | Institution-branded AI access layer for campus-wide rollout |
Evaluation framing
Three practical questions to answer before rollout.
Where should humans stay in control?
Define the approvals, publishing actions, or judgment-bearing decisions that should remain institution-controlled.
What systems need to stay in place?
Map the handoffs into SIS, CRM, LMS, and website workflows that the institution is not trying to replace.
Frequently asked questions
What institutions usually want clarified.
What is Enrollix now that there are five products?
Enrollix is the umbrella brand for a five-product suite that spans application review, campaign launch, institutional support, course support, and governed AI access.
Do we need to buy the whole suite at once?
No. Institutions can start with a single product, solve the workflow that matters most right now, and expand into the rest of the suite later.
What is Enrollix AI Gateway?
AI Gateway is the managed institutional access layer for governed, branded, multi-model AI use across campus teams. It is separate from the workflow products and is designed for controlled rollout rather than unmanaged tool sprawl.
Does Enrollix replace our SIS, CRM, or LMS?
That is not the intended framing. The suite is positioned to work alongside systems already in place rather than replace every enterprise workflow outright.
Where should security and privacy details live?
Those are now better understood as shared Platform and Privacy content rather than as repetitive copy blocks on every product page.
What happened to TranscriptAI?
TranscriptAI is preserved as the transcript processing engine inside AppAssist rather than as the site-wide brand story.
Use the comparison to choose the right Enrollix starting point.
We can tailor a walkthrough around admissions review, campaign launch, institutional Q&A, course-level support, or governed AI access.
Request demo